|
General's
decisions, on the merits, can be considered. However, the Attorney
General himself conceded that the Court (in Jersey) had a limited
power to examine the Attorney General's exercise of his powers under
that law. It is therefore interesting to note that the ultimate
ruling in the Jersey case was (page 51) -
"1 It is not in
the public interest that the decision of the Attorney General
to issue a Notice under the law should be reviewable as to its
merits.
2. Nevertheless,
the Court has the power and in appropriate cases should exercise
it to enquire into the three matters concerning the exercise of
the Attorney General's discretion mentioned by Mr Clyde-Smith,
that is to say
(a) whether the
powers of the Attorney General exist to enable him to make a
decision;
(b) the extent
of those powers; and
(c) whether or
not those powers have been exercised in the appropriate form".
The
conclusion I draw from those rulings is that in Jersey the Court
has a limited power to review the Attorney General's actions but
only as to the procedures and not on the merits, a position which
may well apply in this Island where Petitions of Doleance cannot
be a substitute for an appeal on the merits.
The learned Bailiff at
page 43 stated as follows:-
"...... they show that the English
Courts have, as the Court has noted in the extract from Wade,
been prepared to widen the scope of judicial review and Crown
Court Judges acting administratively and even Governors of Colonies,
have found their decisions subject to judicial review."
The learned Bailiff then
referred to the four cases that came nearest in general content
to the one with which he was dealing (R v Director of Serious Fraud
Office ex P. Saunders, R v Director of Serious Fraud office ex P.
Smith, Moore Stephens v Procureur and Bertoli v Malone. The Smith
case is reported at 1992 3ALL ER p456 and I will return to that
authority later. Both the Saunders and the Smith case were applications
for judicial review under the provisions of the Criminal Justice
Act 1987 by the Director of the Serious Fraud Office.
|